First Selectwoman is Accused of Damaging Her Town
by Marcia Chambers | May 14, 2007 4:50 PM | Permalink | Comments (10)
“What the heck were you thinking when you sent that out?” John Opie, the former First Selectman, demanded of the current First Selectwoman Cheryl Morris.
He was referring to the now infamous press release Morris issued first to the press and then to the RTM at its televised meeting last week. (Click here to read the release.) Before Opie confronted Morris, Republican RTM member Ronald DeFord interrupted RTM Moderator Jim Bruno, trying to stop him from reading a portion of the press release that hangs the town out to dry. “It will hurt our case,” DeFord asserted. Morris’s critics say this is a new low in politics, even for this administration.
But Bruno did not seem to understand. Nor did Democratic Majority Leader John Smith, who observed “it is going out to the public. Let him read it.” Bruno repeated: “It is going out to the public.” So he read on and a dejected DeFord sat down.
The opening of the press release is routine. Mrs. Morris agreed to hire two new lead attorneys to try the Tabor land dispute case, reversing her previous stand.
The first is David Reif, a partner at McCarter & English, who represented the town on the land value of the case until Town Counsel Ed Marcus took it away from him in November, 2005. Reif was scheduled to take it to trial in February 2006. Mrs. Morris said given his long experience on the case it was “prudent” to turn to him. The second is David Monz, an environmental litigator at Updike, Kelly and Spellacy in Hartford. Peter Kelly has long been active in local and national Democratic politics. Monz will defend the town’s decision to take the 77 acre property which lies next to the contaminated town dump. Mrs. Morris told the audience that Marcus recommended Monz. Both firms are considered top of the line.
Mrs. Morris said she acted, not because of outside pressure, but after she learned that David Doyle, the Marcus Law Firm’s litigator whom she said had “done an exceptional job,” needed to have surgery that required a long recuperation. She did not, however, remove the Marcus Law Firm from the case. Instead she put Doyle in what attorneys call the second seat at a trial.
It was Doyle and Jim Bergenn, attorney for the developers, New England Estates, who sought a settlement proposal on Tabor that, had the RTM accepted, would have enabled NEE to build 275 homes on 45 acres of land. But the RTM rejected the settlement idea by unanimous vote.
Morris also disclosed that the Tabor trial judge, William T. Cremins, had decided to separate the two parts of the case, scheduling the property value trial, heard without a jury, for June 25 and the eminent domain taking of the land for August 7. The judge acted on Bergenn’s motion filed on April 4th, a few days after public hearings on Tabor ended.
John Opie was as angry as anyone has ever seen him in public. He clearly felt that the press release read more like the developer’s press release than the town’s. Here are the pertinent parts:
“…The town officials at that time, including DaRos, may very well have acted in good-faith but may not have properly justified the public necessity of taking the property by eminent domain. This is an issue that the court will have to determine.
“It is now up to my administration to do battle as best as possible to protect the interests of the people of Branford and attempt to minimize any award or judgment that may be issued against the Town as the result of the actions of previous administrations.”
Opie asked Mrs. Morris: “Did the new lead counsel have the opportunity to review that press release before it was sent out,” referring to Reif and Monz.
“No. It was all factual,” she replied.
Bruno, ever protective of Mrs. Morris, tried to stop Opie from asking the next question.
“Let me finish,” Opie declared to applause. Bruno let him, perhaps because Opie currently serves as the town’s Third Selectman.
“You as much as prejudiced our case. That’s an absurd press release…” he said, glaring at her.
Coming from the town’s top elected official, her press release was regarded by those who heard it as detrimental to the town’s interests. Lawyers have a term for it: it is called a “declaration against interest,” and it means that she gave ammunition to the other side.
Several lawyers told the Eagle afterward that no lawyer representing the town in the lawsuit would have permitted her to make the statements she made. Ordinarily town counsel would vet a press release, especially if the firm is defending the lawsuit. Indeed the Marcus Law Firm would probably have been negligent if it had not read and approved the press release.
If the newly appointed attorneys did not approve the press release, who did?
Anthony Unk DaRos, former First Selectman,said: “This is not Cheryl Morris speaking. The only thing they are trying to do right now is to put Tabor back on me and Opie. That was the purpose of these statements,” DaRos said, noting the political campaign was underway. He and Opie are both running for her position this November.
DaRos, who did not attend the RTM meeting, told the Eagle he was so outraged when he read the press release that his words could not have been printed. “I can’t believe the damage that woman is doing intentionally….To make a statement like that and to put the town out on a limb like this…” He did not finish his sentence.
Back at the meeting, Opie was furious with her characterization of him when he served as First Selectman and was dealing with the developer, New England Estates, which does not own the property but has an option to build on it—if permits can be obtained. The owners, Thomas Santa Barbara, Jr. and Frank Perrotti have a separate lawsuit against the town.
The press release states “Both of these litigation matters were initiated during the DaRos administration and the taking of the property occurred during the Opie Administration. The Opie administration took the property through eminent domain for $1.2 million. The previous property owners purchased the land for $2.3 million in 1991. New England Estates, the plaintiffs, are now claiming damages in an amount of $21 million for the alleged wrongful taking of a 77 acre parcel on Tabor Drive…”
Opie told Morris that “by the time we were looking at this property, the permits to build on that property had expired. The amount we came up with came out of two appraisals. It is the median value we pay for open space land. If you read what you wrote, it makes us look like we were damn fools and trying to hoodwink this property owner and I really resent it.”
His remarks brought down the house, eliciting applause across party lines.
Toward the end of the evening, after numerous notes were passed between her and Walter Spader,.a Marcus Law Firm attorney, Mrs. Morris responded to Opie’s comments.
Now she said the controversial parts of the press release were “allegations” made by the developer. But RTM David Baker pointed out that the statements were made in her own voice, never citing the developer or his attorney as having made the “allegations.”
So in a matter of hours, what began as “factual”—-a statement of fact—became “allegations”—apparently no longer fact, making one wonder if she even reviewed the release before sending it out. Baker wanted to pursue it, but Bruno cut him off.
The issue now on the floor was a resolution by Kurt Schwanfelder, the Republican Minority leader.(Left) The purpose of the resolution was to direct the Board of Selectman to hire “a fully-resourced legal defense team consisting of additional legal professionals who are specialists.” In fact, Reif had been retained the first week of May. He and Doyle were seen discussing the case at Town Hall.
Mrs. Morris waited until the afternoon of the RTM meeting to send out her press release, beating Schwanfelder to the punch. But Schwanfelder went forward anyway, saying “this dispute is a grave matter to all Branford’s residents…” He and others said the RTM needed to be fully engaged in the Tabor litigation given the surprises of past months. The resolution passed by a vote of 15 to 9.
Many people in the audience were stunned by Morris’s remarks because they knew the history of Tabor. DaRos’s position is that the town had to have control of the property “in order to remediate it. I am not talking about contamination. I am talking about public safety. To me it is a moral issue.” The eminent domain seizure was supported overwhelmingly by the Board of Selectmen, the RTM (twice), the Board of Finance, Planning and Zoning and Inland Wetlands.
Tabor follows Queach, Founders Village and now Hilltop. Regardless of the image they put forth, the Morris-Marcus administration has courted developers, even though Branford has been described as the condo capitol of Connecticut.
We should note that the wild hoopla of the evening began with Tabor and ended with Tabor. In between, in what was a remarkably orderly process, the RTM adopted (with three Republicans dissenting) an $85 million budget for fiscal 2007-08.
##
Comments
Posted by: Brian Festa | May 15, 2007 2:24 PM
I wish I had been there to actually hear the words from the First Selctwoman and Town Counsel...the craziness continues. Good for John Opie to be enraged by the false allegations and false promises coming out of Town Hall. The town is constinuing to sell out to developers, when will it stop? Again here is another case where the Moderator was WRONG in handling notices, procedures and Roberts Rules.
Posted by: emjay
| May 15, 2007 6:16 PM
Another great article. This is actually going to be a very important case in eminent domain law. Too bad we're going to pay big bucks to write that law.
This quote gives rise to some questions:
"The amount we came up with came out of two appraisals. It is the median value we pay for open space land." Was this property taxed as open space all along? Was this property on an open space plan for the town?
If the town wants to control development, there has got to be economic encouragement for owners not to develop their property. The strategy of taxing landowners on highest and best use-- which means the land will have houses on it-- then freaking out at the point of sale to a developer or filing for permits is really a pretty cheesy way to create a development plan. That leads right down the path of eminent domain and costly law suits. Isn't there a less reactive approach?
Posted by: dman | May 15, 2007 11:02 PM
I agree with emjay. How was this property taxed prior to the taking? Was it ever zoned for anything? Was it on the towns list for open space? The constitution protects property from eminent domain. It has to be done properly, that is legally and fairly. It doesn't matter how an emotional RTM votes. An illegal taking comes with a large price tag. How did DaRoss and Opie handle this? Were they getting valid legal advice or being led down the primrose path? These are questions the RTM should be looking at because it appears they were oblivious to the impact this will have on the town.
Posted by: Mojito. T.E. | May 15, 2007 11:08 PM
Just another sad state of affairs coming out of town hall. The press release was to cover their tail, no more no less. Folks please note, if you had not voted in the last local election, and there were many of you, this is what happens. We get incompetent leaders, who have less than stellar plans for our town. Branford is for sale and for the right price, the Morris/Marcus regime will cut you a deal.
I have one question, why did this case not go before the courts back a year or so ago? Was it because Morris thru her hiring of the Marcus law firm threw out the two law firms that started the case? One firm, that go figure, the town is now hiring back. Talk about incompetent leadership, well it just doesn't get any worse than this.
Good for John Opie to tell it like it is, at least there is one individual on the Board of Selectman who has his intentions in the right place.
Posted by: E. Cleveland
| May 17, 2007 8:46 AM
You shouldn't forget that it was a unanimous vote by the Board of Selectman to accept the proposed Tabor settlement. That means that John Opie voted to accept the proposed Tabor settlement. How is that "telling it like it is?" When a selectman votes in favor of something, that means he supports it. Yes, I agree that he subsequently changed his mind about it, but then so apparently did Cheryl when she was asked.
Posted by: john | May 18, 2007 7:58 AM
Those questioning the taxation should ask in Town Hall where the answers are. The land for many years has been zoned and taxed as "light industrial" at a value slightly LESS than what was given for it.
At the BOS meeting I made it abundantly clear that I was not voting in support of the proposal but only to send it to the RTM...the appropriate body to consider it. I did not support it from the start so never had to change my mind.
Posted by: Steve
| May 18, 2007 11:15 AM
E.Cleveland,
I've read your comments before, so I know you are a regular reader. Just check out the following excerpt from "Branford's Love Canal by marcia chambers | February 14, 2007"
"The Board agreed to authorize postponing the trial until August and sent the settlement proposal to the RTM. John Opie, the lone Republican on the three-member Board, said he wanted to give the RTM and the Commissions the right to say "yea or nay" and he would comment afterward."
Honest criticism of our leaders is essential to an effective government and some of your comments have been somewhat insightful. But, if you wish your comments to be interpreted as more than simple propaganda supporting your "side" (personally, I wish we'd all just be on Branford's 'side' and forget all the labels...the 2 party system is the bane of American politics), then you have to exercise some intellectual honesty and tell it like it is...
John Opie never approved of this settlement in any way, shape or form. I doubt Unk would have ever, either. Only someone who is beholden to her own self interests and those of her contributors would open the door again and expose the town, while putting less competent representation on the town's buck.
Posted by: E. Cleveland
| May 23, 2007 9:06 AM
Steve: I think you have misunderstood what happened. The BOS had to vote YES in order for it to go to the RTM. That is exactly my point. Had the BOS voted NO on the settlement, it would never have gone to the RTM. There was no need for it to go yet again to the RTM when twice before they had made it clear that development was not on option. Their unanimous rejection of the settlement makes that clear. Also, Unk has publicly stated that he would never have voted YES to send it to the RTM. I'm sorry you felt the need to question my "intellectual honesty."
Posted by: B. Ryan | May 23, 2007 10:36 PM
What if it turns out that Morris was correct and that the judge was gently suggesting that an egregious error may have been made? Does anyone know if the proposed "settlement" guarenteed any unit ap[provals to the developers? -- or just the right to approach P & Z?
Posted by: KNelson | May 24, 2007 11:30 PM
ECleveland,
Had the Board of Selectmen voted to not accept the proposal, then they would have assumed that the RTM had absolutely no say one way or the other on a previously undisclosed settlement option being offered. Given the magnitude of the case, and given the proposed settlement would have involved a land transfer, the Board of Selectmen, honestly had little choice in my opinion (and the opinion of our Town Charter with respect to land transfers) but to send it to the RTM for consideration. The Board of Selectman could not have voted it down as all issues related to land transfers of town property must be heard by the RTM per our Charter.
Given many of the current RTM members were not even in office when the last vote was taken on Tabor, the process albeit redundant, served to educate those new members running our government on the issue. In addition, their vote served to further solidify that the elected officials before them, myself included (4th District RTM, former Chair Administrative Services Committee) made the right decision a few years ago regarding Tabor.
I applaud John for doing the right thing and sending it to the RTM, by no means, did he imply that vote was supporting the settlement. As a matter of fact the vote at the Board of Selectman was to refer the item to the RTM for consideration. To imply his vote meant he favored the settlement or that he appropriately could have denied the offer is not correct.
I think the bigger concern is why has this case dragged out for so long, was it due to the transfer of legal business as earlier commented? If so, did this delay compromise the town's position? Certainly the delays lead to a change in legal venue. I guess we will have to wait and see.
Sections
Neighborhood News
Special Sections
Some Favorite Sites
- At Risk for HD
- Branford Eagle
- Brian's Commentaries
- Business NH
- CT Energy Blog
- CT Green Scene
- CT Law Tribune
- CT Local Politics
- CT News Junkie
- CTV
- ChiTown Daily News
- Conn Art Scene
- Crosscut
- Design New Haven
- Folk Alley
- Gina Coggio
- Gotham Gazette
- Hamden Daily News
- La Voz Hispana
- Len's Lens
- Magrisso Forte
- Media Attache
- Medical Intelligence
- Metrocrawl
- MinnPost
- My Left Nutmeg
- NBC 30
- NH Advocate
- NH Register
- NH Review of Books
- OneWorld
- Only In Bridgeport
- Oral History Project
- Pittsburgh Dish
- See Click Fix
- Smartpill Design
- SoWhay Sonata
- Some Stuff To Do Today
- St. Louis Beacon
- Voice of SD
- WFSB-TV
- WPKN Today
- WTNH
- Yale Daily News
- barista
Government/ Community Links
- Advocate Calendar
- Ald. Meetings
- Arts & Ideas
- Arts Council
- Artspace
- Beth El Keser Israel
- Bioregional Group
- Boys & Girls Club
- CTRIBAT
- Chamber of Commerce
- Children's Museum
- City of New Haven
- CitySeed
- Citywide Youth
- Columbus House
- Community Loan Fund
- Community Mediation
- ConnCAN
- Dariba Referrals
- Data Haven
- Domestic Violence Srvcs.
- Election Volunteers
- Elm City Cycling
- Empower NH
- Ezra Academy
- GAVA
- Habitat For Humanity
- Hill Health
- Hilltop Brigade
- IRIS
- Info New Haven
- Jewish Federation
- Job Finder
- Junta
- LEAP
- Leeway
- Mary Wade
- NH Land Trust
- NH Safe Streets
- NH/ Leon Sister City
- NHCAN
- New Haven 828
- New Life Corp.
- Parents Available to Help
- Planned Parenthood
- Police
- Preservation Trust
- Public Allies CT
- Public Library
- Public Schools
- Public Works
- Register Calendar
- SAMA
- STRIVE-New Haven
- Solar Youth
- Soul-O-Ettes
- United Way
- Urban Design League
- Urban Resources Initiative
- W'ville Synagogue
- Westville Chabad
- Westville Renaissance
- Wooster Sq MT
- Workforce Alliance
- Yale Events
- Youth Continuum
Legal Notices
Sponsors
N.H.I. Site Design & Development
NHI Store
Buy New Haven Independent Stuff
News Feed
Movable Type 3.35