Arrested Top Cop Keeps Running Out Clock

A top cop accused of assaulting his wife and holding his family hostage turned down a state-offered plea deal — then found a way to prolong his 14-month-and-counting court case for at least another three weeks while keeping the rejected plea deal still on the table.

Lt. Rahgue Tennant earned that latest judicial continuance Monday afternoon in state Superior Court Judge Melanie Cradle’s ground-floor courtroom at 121 Elm St.

Judge Cradle was prepared to proceed with a pre-trial hearing and get the case finally moving Monday afternoon after he rejected the plea deal.

But then the former Dixwell district manager claimed to Cradle that, after all this time, he simply hasn’t had enough time to discuss his year-plus court case with his lawyer, Norm Pattis.

So Cradle granted Tennant a continuance until Nov. 25. She left the rejected plea deal offer on the table. On Nov. 25, she said, he must give a final answer as to whether or not he accepts a state-offered plea deal he initially rejected on Monday.

The continuance keeps Tennant’s case in pre-trial for at least another three weeks, allowing the top cop to inch that much closer to Jan. 25, 2020 — the date when he would hit 20 years on the force. Per the police union contract, Tennant would then fully vest to a much larger pension than if he were to resign or be fired before reaching two decades of employment with the New Haven Police Department.

Tennant was arrested well over a year ago — in September 2018 — when a SWAT response was deployed to his East Shore home to investigate allegations that he had abused and intimidated his wife and held his kids hostage and threatened to shoot up the house.

The state subsequently charged the top cop with six domestic violence charges, including one felony count of second-degree assault, one felony count of first-degree unlawful restraint, one misdemeanor count of second-degree threatening, and three felony counts of risk of injury to a minor.

Tennant has been on paid administrative leave at the NHPD since his arrest. The department claims it can’t take disciplinary action — or jeopardize his pension — until his criminal case is resolved.

That criminal case has dragged on and on, with at least six continuances stemming largely from stated scheduling conflicts between Pattis, Cradle, and Assistant State’s Attorney Laura DeLeo.

In that time, police brass have failed to release records about Tennant’s alleged misdeeds and the results of an internal investigation. Their stated reason: none of that can be provided until Tennant’s court case is closed out.

On Monday, when Cradle emerged from a private conference in chambers at 2:53 p.m. for a 2 p.m. scheduled hearing, Tennant’s case appeared to be on the brink of moving closer towards public scrutiny and debate.

In introducing the case, DeLeo said that the state had offered Tennant a plea deal whereby he would engage in additional counselling in order to ​“receive the benefit of a suspended sentence” — that is, avoid jail time.

“My understanding is that the defendant doesn’t wish to avail himself of the offer and wants to reject it today,” DeLeo said. ​“I will revoke that offer at this point in time.”

Cradle then turned to Pattis and Tennant. Anything to add? she asked Tennant’s lawyer. Pattis said he was ready to proceed.

So Cradle moved on to the pro forma questions judges ask every defendant at the start of a hearing.

“Are you under the influence of anything at all today that would affect your ability to understand what’s happening here?” asked Cradle.

“No, ma’am,” replied Tennant.

“And did you have enough time to discuss your case with Attorney Pattis?”

At that, Tennant paused for five seconds. His mouth shut, staring back at Cradle. He then replied: ​“No.”

“No?” Cradle said. ​“Do you want additional time to discuss the case as well as the offer and the exposure you face if you go to trial?”

Yes, Tennant said.

How about Nov. 25? Pattis asked.

So Cradle turned to DeLeo.

The assistant state’s attorney said she was a bit caught off guard. She wasn’t expecting to have to delay arguing the case yet again. She didn’t even have her calendar with her. But after rifling through her bag, she found a calendar and confirmed that the 25th worked for her, too.

Cradle turned back to Tennant. ​“Make sure you’re here” on the 25th, she said. She said she’ll go through the same questions she asked Monday, as well as some additional ones.

“You’ll have to let me know if you’re going to resolve your case on that day” and take the plea deal, Cradle said, ​“or else it goes on the trial list.”

The Alleged Crime

Sgt. Shayna L.Kendall wrote an investigative report into the Tennant matter. The text of the report, including redactions (in brackets), follows:

On September 6, 2019 at approximately 1759 hours, I received a notification call-out for the Hostage Negotiation Team to stage at 830 Woodward Avenue (Distrcit 9 Substation). The information provided was that New Haven Police Lt. Rahgue Tennant barricaded himself in his residence at [ ] after not allowing his wife, [ ] and their three children to leave. Further information revealed that [ ] was able to escape with her children to a neighborhood residence.

Upon arrival to 830 Woodward Avenue, I was met by Command Staff as well as Emergency Services Personnel to discuss the details of the incident. ESU and partnering agencies reconvened to the area surrounding [ ] in an attempt to make contact with a despondent Lt. Rahgue Tennant. Shortly after communication was established, [ ] and her children were relocated to 830 Woodward Avenue where Detective C. Carr and I spoke with her about the events that led up to this incident.

[ ] presented with a discolored and swollen right eye and red marks on her chest and neck area [ ] was crying and in great concern for her well-being and the safety of that of her children and her mother. [ ] indicated that she has been in a relationship with Rahgue since 2004 and they became married in 2009.

[ ] stated that her movement had been restricted by Rahgue since Thursday, August 30, 2018. [ ] stated it was this date that Rahgue had become upset with her and threw a Lysol bottle at her head which caused a large hematoma. [ ] stated Rahgue invited Police Commissioner Greg Smith to their home and had dinner prepared in the oven. [ ] stated Rahgue became upset because the home required cleaning because they were expecting a guest. [ ] indicated that she could not understand if Rahgue became upset about the uncleanliness of the home or that there had been a fly in the home but he had subsequently left.

[ ] stated Rahgue had increased his alcoholic intake and would consume alcohol heavily especially when he would go out. [ ] stated it was no surprise to her that when Rahgue returned to the home, he was irritated. [ ] stated she had been in the bedroom putting the children to bed when Rahgue turned on the lights and began to argue about not having food prepared for him. Raghue stated, ​“You didn’t make no fucking diner?” [ ] stated she initially told Rahgue that the food was in the oven, however, realized he was agitated and had been out drinking which provoked her to get up to prepare the food for him.

[ ] stated Rahgue told her ​“from now on when you have something to throw in the trash, you walk your lazy ass outside and throw it in the trash.” [ ] advised Rahgue that they would have to come up with a different solution which [ ] believed Rahgue interpreted as her being disrespectful. Meanwhile [ ] stated she was carrying the dinner plate when Rahgue threw the Lysol can at her head striking her head and face [ ] stated the impact almost instantly created a large hematoma on her head.

[ ] stated she believed Rahgue knew he hurt her, however, perhaps not as bad as he did. [ ] stated Rahgue told her to put ice on her face to avoid the children seeing her face. [ ] stated Rahgue instructed her to go seek treatment at the hospital and to ​“tell them everything” but warned ​“you’ll lose everything.” [ ] became fearful and interpreted this comment as Rahgue may ​“kill” and cause harm to their children. [ ] therefore was unable to seek adequate medical treatment and was told to heal herself by Rahgue. [ ] stated she did not sleep that night and the hematoma began to drain which caused her discolored eye and right side of her face.

[ ] advised that the following day, Rahgue went to Walmart to purchase makeup to conceal her bruising as well as a variety of treatment interventions. [ ] stated at one point Rahgue yelled at her for possibly laying on her injury which made the swelling and appearance of the injury worse. [ ] stated Rahgue would not allow her to leave the home as someone may see and inquire about her head and face. [ ] added Rahgue maintained possession of the family vehicles as well. [ ] stated this was the only instance of physical abuse she endured from Thursday August 30, 2018 until police arrived on September 6, 2018.

[ ] stated in the following days succeeding this incident, Rahgue pulled out several of his weapons and began to clean them in her their bedroom. [ ] stated Rahgue had never done this and while doing so told her that if ​“anyone comes in the house will get lit up.” [ ] knew this to mean Rahgue would shoot them and feared for her safety as well. With a combination of his words and the cleaning of his weapons in her presence, [ ] feared this was a reality.

[ ] stated she believed threats Rahgue made to be true due to historical abuse where Rahgue has told her that if she threatened the loss of anything he had worked hard for, she would not live to enjoy it. [ ] stated Rahgue had become increasingly aggressive with the more power he obtained within the police department and he had purchased new equipment including magazines and ammunition for his weapons.

[ ] stated she had been planning to seek permanent refuge away from Rahgue due to the ongoing physical violence which also included financial abuse, verbal and emotional abuse. [ ] stated Rahgue does not allow her to work to maintain dominance and control over he. [ ] stated over the past few days she has been contacting Umbrella Center to obtain services and was looking to relocate. It was on September 6, 2018 that Umbrella was notified about physical abuse to [ ] and Rahgue’s children and subsequently notified Department of Children and Families.

[ ] stated she was familiar was familiar with the mandated reporting system and knew that Umbrella would report the incident which is what sparked her need to seek immediate refuge. [ ] stated DCF responded to her home on September 6, 2018. [ ] stated she tried to minimize her communication with them and was given a contact card by the DCF worker.

[ ] stated Rahgue arrived and asked why DCF was at his home. [ ] stated they have surveillance within their home as well as notifications Rahgue receives when someone comes to the home. [ ] stated Rahgue demanded to know and became extremely paranoid. [ ] stated Rahgue was peering through the blinds and was able to speak to someone. [ ] stated she could not hear exactly what he was saying, however, Rahgue told her ​“now Tony and Herb calling me.” Rahgue was referring to Assistant Chief Otonial Reyes as well as Patrol Commander Lt. Herbert Sharp. [ ] stated Rahgue initially refused to answer and told her to ​“tell em I’m in the shower.” [ ] stated she then received a call [ ] which Rahgue stated ​“I don’t answer the phone so Tony gets his wife to all you.”

[ ] stated she answered the phone and attempted to convey that everything was going fine, however, she soon realized that Assistant Chief Reyes was on the phone. [ ] stated she was asked if she was alright and she responded affirmatively and quickly told him she would call him back.

[ ] stated as she heard the shower running, she knew this was her only opportunity to flee the home with her children. [ ] stated she frantically ran to [ ] and entered the unlocked home of [a witness].

[ ] continue to provide historical abuse information which she had never reported to the police. [ ] had to be redirected several times as it appeared as though when speaking of one instance of abuse, it triggered an instance of another familiar time. [ ] stated her children has been present during abusive altercations including this incident and has shown signs of being affected by it. [ ] was advised that her children would be interviewed forensically with her consent as well as obtain services from Yale Child Study.

I subsequently met with Lauigina Allen of DCF Milford. Allen advised me that she received a referral on September 6, 2018 at 1850 hours. The minimum information provided on the referral was that [ ] advised of a fear of physical violence and was fearful of retaliation. Allen stated she and another DCF worker attempted to make contact with [ ] first at 278 Peck Street, however, was unsuccessful. Allen stated they then went to [ ] and did not initially get an answer at the door. Allen stated as they were walking away, [ ] opened the door and Allen asked if her husband (Rahgue) was home. [ ] told Allen he was not, however, decided it was not a good time to speak with Allen.

Allen stated she received a call from Rahgue inquiring as to why she had come to his home. Allen stated Rahuge was initially apprehensive and suspicious asking if Allen was truly a representative of DCF. Allen stated the Program Manager Tricia Falcone then spoke with Rahgue to advise and confirm Allen was from DCF. Allen stated Raghue was informed of their DCF protocol and that an investigation would need to be completed to include a welfare check of the children. Rahgue was adamant that no one was coming to his home and the New Haven Police Department was contacted. Allen stated she spoke with Sgt. C Fennessey who told her that he would coordinate personnel to accompany them on the necessary welfare check. Allen stated before that could be accomplished, the incident turned into a hostage incident.

After speaking with Allen, Detective Carr and I went to 20 York Street CIU in an effort to make contact with Rahgue Tennant. Upon initial contact, Rahgue indicated that he did not feel well and was suffering from a headache.

Following contact with Rahgue, we met with [a witness]. [The witness] stated that she was home with her elderly mother and son when [ ] entered her unlocked home in a panic. [The witness] stated [ ] had her children with her and all [ ] was saying was to ​“Call 9 – 1‑1.” [The witness] stated at this point she did not know what happened and assumed someone was chasing [ ]. [The witness] stated [ ] locked the door to her home and then started to lock doors and windows inside of her home in apparent fear.

[The witness] stated she heard [ ] talking on the phone and gathered what occurred. It should be noted, [the witness] was initially apprehensive in speaking to Detective Carr and I and stated she was fearful of retaliation if information was provided to Rahgue that she aided [ ] as well as spoke to the police.